The total net cash flow value of Pittsburgh’s parking garages and metered spaces for the next 50 years could reach an estimated $3.2 billion. But the city’s potential up-front windfall from leasing those assets to a firm who would privately manage and profit from them still wouldn’t resolve Pittsburgh’s looming pension shortfall.
Those are a few of the basic conclusions that the Finance Scholars Group presented to Pittsburgh City Council Friday afternoon in a hearing over the firm’s study of the city’s parking assets and the options it faces in resolving the city’s looming pension obligations. The Finance Scholars Group was commissioned by city council to conduct the study.
“This will be the most important piece of legislation that this council votes on,” said Darlene Harris, president of city council, in announcing FSG’s presentation. “We want to get it right.”
FSG talked through six different options the city has: Shifting parking assets to the pension fund, selling the garages and surface lots owned by the Pittsburgh Parking Authority, raising parking revenue through a private management firm, issuing a bond backed by increased parking revenue, leasing the parking to an outside operator, and allowing the state to take over the pension plan and raise extra revenue through increased parking.
After quickly dismissing the first three options, FSG walked council through a gnarled collection of scenarios.
“I don’t envy your decision,” said Chester Spatt, a principal of FSG and the director of the Center for Financial Markets at Carnegie Mellon University’s Tepper School of Business.
FSG’s report comes a few days after Mayor Luke Ravenstahl’s administration received bids by investment groups interested in leasing the city’s parking assets for 50 years. The highest bid was $452 million by an investment team that combined J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Connecticut-based LAZ Parking.
Ravenstahl is working to generate at least $200 million to infuse into the city’s pension fund to avoid a state takeover of the fund. The Pittsburgh Parking Authority’s 13 parking garages, 32 metered parking lots and about 8,000 on-street metered spaces generated a number of bids more than $300 million.
To be sure, if the city follows through with leasing off its parking, higher parking rates will follow.
FSG’s study projects that a leaseholder, to generate profit from the arrangement, would increase parking rates in the garages from $3.75 to $7.00 for an hour or less in a Pittsburgh Parking Authority garage, an increase that becomes comparatively more modest the longer the parking term.
“In some ways, it’s like borrowing from the future,” Spatt said.
City controller Michael Lamb questioned whether the city could implement such increases itself without leasing the parking off, treating the added revenue as an asset that would help better leverage funding for its pension obligations.
Spatt agreed while unsure of the legal issues of the city in doing so. He emphasized that he believes the city’s pension underfunding is underestimated based on over-optimistic investment assumptions.
“This has generally been sold as a panacea,” said councilman Doug Shields, district five, of the mayor’s plan to lease city parking assets. “You don’t arrive at a simple answer for a complex problem.”
“This is a frustrating situation,” said Natalia Rudiak, councilwoman who represents the city’s southern communities of district 4. On the broad issue of the city’s historically underfunded pensions, she added: “It’s fundamentally unfair for us to keep kicking the can down the road.”
Source